Legal Opinion

Fry v. Stetson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1954No. Appeals, 95, 96 and 97PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

This is an appeal by defendants from the entry of judgment on the pleadings in favor of the plaintiff in an action in ejectment to recover possession of an undivided five-eighteenths interest in premises known as Pleasant Yalley and for mesne profits.

The facts disclosed by the pleadings reveal that under the will of John B. Stetson, who died in 1906, his son, G. Henry Stetson, was given a right or privilege to use and occupy a property known as Pleasant Yalley, free of rent, taxes, and all ordinary and necessary repairs. Under the terms of the will testator’s trustees were…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fry v. StetsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Braunschweiger's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Disston EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Edelman's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Appeal of WilenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. MALONEY v. RodgersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Shober Farms, Inc. v. MerrillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Bergmann EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Montgomery County · 1958
  4. Fraim v. Katz, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1975
  5. Wright v. Elite Revenue Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API