Legal Opinion

Fry v. Stetson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 27, 1952No. Appeal, 49PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

Plaintiff, a judgment creditor of John B. Stetson, Jr., filed a Bill in Equity in 1948 for a partition of premises known as Pleasant Valley. She prayed not for a partition of future interests, but for an immediate partition of her debtor’s presently existing interest in the premises. The basis of her claim is that G. Henry Stetson was devised only a personal license to use and occupy Pleasant Valley; that he abandoned this license, and consequently Pleasant Valley became a part of testator’s residuary trust estate, of which John B. Stetson, Jr. owned an undivided…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Vrabel v. SCHOLLERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Wusthoff v. DracourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  3. Lerch's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Braunschweiger's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Disston EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of McCreaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Brereton EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Lombardo v. DeMarcoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Way EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. In Re Estate of BrojackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API