Disston Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linn,
There are two appeals and they raise different questions.
No. 258 depends on the interpretation of a family agreement dated May 3, 1932, in its relation to a trust created in the residuary clause of the will of Mary Diss-ton, who died July 15, 1895. The residue was given in trust to pay the income “. . . semi-annually to my sons in equal shares, the children of any son of mine who may he deceased at the time of my death to receive the income which the parent would have received if living. But upon the death of any of my sons who may be living at the time of my death…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McMillin v. TitusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Connery v. BrookeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
- McKeesport Machine Co. v. Ben Franklin InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Strauss v. W. H. Strauss Co., Inc. (Et Al.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Friday's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Foulke v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Clark EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Way EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Fry v. StetsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Hull v. RolfsrudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.