Legal Opinion

MALONEY v. Rodgers

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1957No. Appeals, 32, 33PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, P. J.,

This action in trespass to recover for personal injuries and property damage arises out of a collision between two automobiles. One of the cars was owned by plaintiffs, Mary Maloney and Clara H. Maloney. At the time of the accident it was being operated by Mary Maloney, apparently on her own business. The other car was owned and operated by defendant, Patrick E. Rodgers. Plaintiffs filed a complaint to recover dam ages to their car and for personal injuries sustained by Mary Maloney. The defendant did not file an answer, but filed a counterclaim against Mary Maloney…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Fisher v. DyeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Fisher v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Frank v. W. S. Losier Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. TEACHER v. KijurinaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Kiser v. SchlosserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Onorato v. Wissahickon Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Cason v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Mains v. MOORESuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Moorehead v. LopatinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Kubacki v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API