Scrima v. UPMC Mercy
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County
1Opinion of the Court
WETTICK, J.,
Plaintiffs have requested documents containing information created or compiled by hospital staff relevant to the injuries sustained by the plaintiff-patient while under the hospital’s care. The request is limited to two documents identified by *80defendant as protected by the Peer Review Protection Act, 63 P.S. §§425.1-425.4: a timeline/chronology of events prepared by Tammy Vogel, RN, and a reeducation plan prepared by LaSalle Desmet, RN.
Plaintiffs respond that these documents were not prepared solely for purposes of peer review and contain factual information otherwise available…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dodson v. DeleoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Atkins v. Pottstown Memorial Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Young v. Western Pennsylvania HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Troescher v. GrodySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Piroli v. LodicoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.