D'AMOURS v. Hills
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, C. J.
In State v. Kinne, 41 N. H. 238, it was decided that the State is not bound by a statute which bars any of its prerogatives, rights, titles or interests, unless the statute by express words includes the State in its provisions. Accordingly, it was held that the State was not liable for costs either in civil or criminal proceedings. Following this opinion the Legislature provided that in civil actions in which the State is plaintiff, if the defendant prevails, he may recover costs against the county where the judgment is rendered. R. L., c. 397, s. 12.
Revised Laws, chapter 365, section 3, does…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McClay v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- San Francisco Law & Collection Co. v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Holmes v. City of MattoonIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- State v. RushingSupreme Court of Florida · 1879
- Walker v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Dover Housing Authority v. FeeneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975