Legal Opinion

State v. Rushing

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1879PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Westcott

The defendant in error in this case moves to dismiss the writ of error, upon the ground that the State has failed to give the statutory, bond. It-is insisted by defendant in error that while there may not be a judgment against the Stale without her consent given in a legal manner, still the State, when she enters her own courts as a plaintiff seeking judicial remedies, paust conform to the general statutory , requirements of practice which she has prescribed by the legislation controlling the subject.

'. On. the other hand, the State here insists that the statute, construed according to the.…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Road Department v. ZetrouerSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  2. Rio Vista Hotel & Improvement Co. v. Belle Mead Development Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937
  3. City of Miami v. MurphyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  4. D'AMOURS v. HillsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1951
  5. State Road Department v. BramlettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API