Legal Opinion

Holmes v. City of Mattoon

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1884PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Writ of Error to the Appellate Court for the Third District ; — heard in that court on appeal from the County Court of Coles county; the Hon. Charles Bennett, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

In this case there was an appeal by the city to the Appellate Court for the Third District. In that court a motion was made to dismiss the case, because the city had, under the act of 1879, (Sess. Laws, 222,) appealed without giving bond. It is now urged that section 71, as amended by that act, is unconstitutional, because it relieves all municipal corporations from the law requiring appellants and plaintiffs in error, on obtaining a supersedeas, from giving bond.

It is urged that section is violative of the constitution, because it is special or local legislation. Nothing could be more…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Beardsley v. WallaceIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Andrews v. RumseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Coon v. SommercampIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Anderson v. SchubertIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Fosselman v. City of SpringfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
  4. Abbott v. LeeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  5. Bishop v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API