Legal Opinion
Albert Lea Amusement Corp. v. Hanson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 23, 1950No. 35,116PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment construing M. S. A. 614.01, which provides:
*403“A lottery is a scheme for the distribution of property by chance among persons who have paid, or agreed to pay, a valuable consideration for the chance, whether it shall be called a lottery, raffle, gift enterprise, or by any other name, and is hereby declared unlawful and a public nuisance.
“Every person who shall contrive, propose, or draw a lottery, or shall assist in contriving, proposing, or drawing a lottery, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- State v. DanzWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- State ex rel. Beck v. Fox Kansas Theatre Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- State v. EamesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Stafford v. Fox-Great Falls Theatre Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Knox Industries Corp. v. State ex rel. ScanlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Minnesota Souvenir Milkcaps, LLC v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Albert Lea Amusement Corp. v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- State v. KussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957