State v. Jones
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SADLER, Justice.
State appeals from an order sustaining defendants’ motion to quash an information and directing their discharge. They were informed against for conducting a lottery in promoting what is generally known as “Bank Night”-at a moving picture theatre in the city of Roswell. The facts are substantially the same as those presented in City of Roswell v. Jones, 41 N.M. 258, 67 P.2d 286, and if that decision is to be followed here, even though declared erroneous, the trial court’s action m sustaining the motion to quash should be upheld.
When the question was before us in the former…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- City of Wink v. Griffith Amusement Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
- Hill v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- State Ex Rel. Williams v. WhitmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Cobb v. McCallSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Molitor v. Kaneland Community Unit District No. 302Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Smith v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
- Santillanes v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Trujillo v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.