Legal Opinion
Albert Lea Amusement Corp. v. Hanson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 23, 1950No. 35,116Published
1Opinion of the Court
231 Minn. 401 (1950)
ALBERT LEA AMUSEMENT CORPORATION
v.
RUDOLPH HANSON AND ANOTHER.[1]
No. 35,116.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
June 23, 1950.
Meighen, Knudson, Sturtz & Peterson, Samuel P. Halpern, and James E.M. Gottlieb, for appellant.
J.A.A. Burnquist, Attorney General, Lowell J. Grady, Assistant Attorney General, Kenneth W. Green, Special Assistant Attorney General, and Rudolph Hanson, County Attorney, for respondents.
THOMAS GALLAGHER, JUSTICE.
Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment construing M.S.A. 614.01, which provides:
"A lottery is a scheme for the distribution of property by chance among…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- City of Wink v. Griffith Amusement Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
- Glover v. MalloskaMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- State v. DanzWashington Supreme Court · 1926
- Commonwealth v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.