Legal Opinion

State v. Danz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1926No. 19756. En BancPublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

— Simon Danz and S. D. Maine were jointly charged with the crime of operating a lottery. They were tried together, convicted, fined, but no costs imposed, and have appealed.

Appellant Danz operated a moving picture show in Seattle known as the Hollywood Theatre, situated in a residential district. Appellant Maine was associated with him in the distribution of groceries or other personal property of value from the stage of the theatre once each week. The property distributed cost the theatre nothing but was collected by Maine from various stores whose compensation was derived from'having their…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Society Theatre v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. Reader's Digest Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. ITM, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Featherstone v. Independent Service Station Ass'n of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Sherwood & Roberts—Yakima, Inc. v. LeachWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Commonwealth v. WallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API