Legal Opinion

In re Attorney's Fees to McLaren v. Paradise Inn Hawaii, Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2014No. SCWC-11-0000460PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

McKENNA, J.

I. Introduction

This case concerns John C. McLaren’s attorney’s fee request to the Director of the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (“Director”) through the Disability Compensation Division of the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (“DCD”), for his representation of a claimant in a workers’ compensation case. John C. McLaren (“McLaren”) presents the following questions on certiorari:

A. Did the ICA gravely err in concluding that the September 7, 2010 appeal to the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board was untimely made?

B. Did the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 1357 v. Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Awakuni v. AwanaHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Schmidt v. Board of Directors of the Ass'n of Apartment OwnersHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Alvarez v. Liberty House, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peer News LLC v. City and County of Honolulu.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Cuzco Development U.S.A, LLC v. JCCHO Hawaii, LLC (In re Cuzco Development U.S.A., LLC)District Court, D. Hawaii · 2017
  3. Peer News LLC v. City and County of Honolulu.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API