Schmidt v. Board of Directors of the Ass'n of Apartment Owners
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
LEVINSON, J.
The plaintiffs-appellants Thomas F. Schmidt and Lorinna Jhincil Schmidt (collectively the Schmidts) appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion for attorneys’ fees, costs, and prejudgment interest. We agree with the trial court that Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 514A-94(b) (Supp. 1991) does not apply to the Schmidts’ action against the defendants-appellees The Board of Directors of the Association of Apartment Owners of the Marco Polo Apartments and Marco Polo Management (collectively the Association). We also conclude that the trial court did not…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anthony P. Locricchio, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Legal Services Corp., Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Leibert v. Finance Factors, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1990
- Espaniola v. Cawdrey Mars Joint VentureHawaii Supreme Court · 1985
- Sapp v. WongHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
- Kang v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. KelekolioHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
- Ross v. Stouffer Hotel Co. (Hawai'i) Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Baehr v. LewinHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
- Sentinel Insurance Co. v. First Insurance Co. of Hawai'i, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.