Pfefferle v. State
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Eyon District Court. Action to enforce a lien for a fine and costs for a violation of the prohibitory liquor law. Judgment for The State, at the January term, 1886. The defendants, Louisa JR. Pfefferle and husband, bring the case here. The opinion states the material "facts.
1Opinion of the Court
*129The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
On October 1, 1883, in the district court of Lyon county, Louis Macke was- convicted upon one count of an information charging him with the sale of intoxicating liquors in violation of the prohibitory law, and acquitted upon two counts of the information; and upon such conviction he was fined in the sum of $250, and adjudged to pay the same and the entire costs, and to stand committed until all were paid. He was never committed to jail. On February 28, 1886, the state filed a petition in the district court of Lyon county against Louisa R.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Busenbark v. BusenbarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Wichita & Western Railroad v. KuhnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- State v. PfefferleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Hardten v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- State of Kansas v. SnyderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
3Cited by3 opinions
- Armstrong, Byrd & Co. v. CrumpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Lowe v. RingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Chapman v. BoyntonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1933