State of Kansas v. Snyder
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Washington District Court. Action by The State to enforce the lien created by § 18 of tbe prohibitory liquor law. Trial at the November Term, 1884, and judgment for the defendants, Snyder and five others, for costs. The State brings the case here. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
*4261. Lien for fines. *425This was an action brought by the county attorney of Washington county, in the name of the state of Kansas, to enforce the lien created by §18 of the prohibitory liquor law. From the petition, it appears that one George E. Ross was convicted of violating that law, and sentenced to pay a fine of $800 and the costs of prosecution, and to stand committed until such fine and costs were paid. The fine and costs were not paid, and the plaintiff brought the action to enforce the lien against the premises upon which the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. PfefferleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Hardten v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
3Cited by5 opinions
- Slater v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
- Snyder v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- State ex rel. Woodbury County Anti-Saloon League v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Pfefferle v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- Chapman v. BoyntonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1933