State v. Noble
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction on two counts of first-degree theft. ORS 164.055. Defendant argues that the trial court improperly denied his request for a hearing to contest the amount of restitution ordered in that judgment. ORS 137.106(1), (5). We affirm.
The relevant facts are undisputed. The evidence at trial established that defendant had, on two separate occasions, stolen two rows of metal stadium seating from Portland Meadows Racetrack. A security officer from Portland Meadows Racetrack testified at trial that each row of seating was valued at $1,500. The jury found…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. HvalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. ZaragozaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. McClellandCoos County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
- State v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. BeckhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.