Legal Opinion

Campbell v. King County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 6, 1984No. 10565-5-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Corbett, A.C.J.

Plaintiffs appeal the judgment dismissing their action for unlawful mandatory retirement. We *476affirm.

This action was commenced more than 3 but less than 6 years after each of the plaintiffs was forced to retire. From April 24, 1970 until August 16, 1977, defendant King County had in effect an ordinance which lowered from 70 to 65 the mandatory age of retirement for its employees. Each of the plaintiffs had been employed by King County prior to 1970, and was a participating member of the Washington State Public Employees' Retirement System. RCW 41.40. The questions of liability…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bakenhus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Lobdell v. Sugar 'N Spice, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  3. McDonald v. WocknerWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Sarruf v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Stover v. Winston Bros. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DePhillips v. Zolt Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. DePhillips v. Zolt Const. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Thurman v. Cowles Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API