Legal Opinion
Lobdell v. Sugar 'N Spice, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 7, 1983No. 9537-4-IPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRingold, J.
The plaintiffs, Kyung Wha Lobdell and Barbara J. Caires, brought this action against the now defunct Sugar 'N Spice, Inc., its president and then sole stockholder, Robert Christopher, and its agents, Joan Wilcox and Martin Bellman, alleging violations of both the Franchise Investment Protection Act (FIPA or Act), RCW 19.100, and the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), RCW 19.86. Finding no statutory violations, the trial court dismissed the action and awarded attorney's fees to the defendants. We reverse.
Sugar 'N Spice (the company) was a California corporation engaged in the business of selling…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Keyes v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- McCutcheon v. BrownfieldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- LaHue v. Keystone Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Beeson v. Atlantic-Richfield Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1977
- Finlay & Associates, Inc. v. Borg-Warner Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Instructional Systems, Inc. v. Computer Curriculum Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Bryant v. Joseph Tree, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
- Blanton v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Neptune T.V. & Appliance Service, Inc. v. Litton Microwave Cooking Products Division, Litton Systems, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
- Ameriquest Mortgage Co. v. Office of Attorney GeneralWashington Supreme Court · 2013
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.