DePhillips v. Zolt Construction Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.
At issue is whether a discharged employee’s action based upon his employer’s alleged violations of discipline and grievance terms in an employee handbook is subject to the six-year statute of limitations applicable to actions upon contracts in writing. We conclude that the six-year limitations period does not apply because as a matter of law the handbook at issue here does not contain all of the essential elements of a written contract. We also hold that insofar as petitioner’s claim is premised upon an alleged employer promise contained in the handbook of specific treatment in specific…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Gaglidari v. Denny's Restaurants, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
- Swanson v. Liquid Air CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- J. W. Seavey Hop Corp. v. PollockWashington Supreme Court · 1944
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Korslund v. DynCorp Tri-Cities Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
- Korslund v. Dyncorp Tri-Cities ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- DePhillips v. Zolt Const. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
- Flower v. T.R.A. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Bulman v. Safeway, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.