Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Egbers

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1924No. 17980PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, C. J.

The plaintiff brought this action on a promissory note which had been indorsed to it by the original payee. One of the defenses was that the note had been fraudulently obtained from the defendants and that the plaintiff took it charged with notice of this infirmity.

The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and the plaintiff moved for a directed verdict, which motion was overruled. After the verdict was returned, a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was interposed and overruled. Judgment was entered on the verdict, and the plaintiff appeals.

This ease is very similar to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McNamara v. JoseWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. First National Bank of Ritzville v. GunningWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Moore & Co. v. BurlingWashington Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pacific States Automotive Finance Corp. v. AddisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Great Western Land & Improvement Co. v. SandygrenWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Pioneer Trust Co. v. CombsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  4. Inland Mortgage & Loan Co. v. CadyWashington Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API