Legal Opinion

Jewett v. Atwood Suspender Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont

Decided March 14, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

I’ll is was an action at law for infringement of a patent.

1Opinion of the Court

WHEELER, District Judge.

This suit is brought upon letters patent of the United States Ho. 286,264, dated October 9, 1883, and granted to William li. dough for an improvement in wire buckles. The declaration alleges an assignment in writing by Clough to Bee-mau Bros., of Swanton, Yt., of the entire right and interest in the unexpired term o£ the patent on April 26th, recorded in the patent office May 12, 1890; and—

“Thai prior to the 5tli day of May, A. D. 1894, said Beeman Bros., under the said name and style of Beeman Bros. Manufacturing Co., was adjudged to he insolvent debtors hy the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ager v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Newton v. BuckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Scrivner v. American Car and Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. Ullman v. ThompsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Ball v. CokerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1909
  4. De Bekker v. Frederick A. Stokes Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1918
  5. Moloney v. F. A. Kuhnert Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API