Legal Opinion

United States v. Milbank, Leaman & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 29, 1926No. 2710PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

The goods involved in this appeal are one case and two parcels of pieces of woolen cloth imported for use as samples. These pieces of cloth are of three general classes. The first consists of pieces of cloth described as “three-quarters width in various lengths, anywhere from one-sixteenth of a yard in length up to three-quarters of a yard in length.” The second class consists of small pieces known as loose patterns, the official samples, which are shown to be typical, being about 2 by 12 and 7 by 9 inches in size. The third class consists of 25 so-called manufacturers’ sectional ranges,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arnold v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Vandegrift v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. F. B. Vandegrift & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. FieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. John A. Steer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Caplan v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  5. Lyons Transport v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API