Legal Opinion
United States v. Field
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 24, 1927No. 2760PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge
The imported merchandise in this case is described in the decision of the Board of General Appraisers, now the United States Customs Court, as follows:
An inspection of Exhibit 1 in this case shows it to consist of a portfolio of a front and back cover, between which are inserted and bound together in book form samples of linen handkerchiefs of different qualities, cut in half. The following printing appears on the front cover:
“Dept. 71. Women’s De Luxe H. S. Linen Handkerchiefs Hand Thread Drawn. M. P. & Co., Chicago.” The sample pieces of handkerchiefs have *377printed labels pasted thereon…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lloyd Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- United States v. Milbank, Leaman & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Drury v. EwingU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1862
- Macmillan Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902
- Badische Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Oxford University Press, New York, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
- Bauer Alphabets, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Nippon Yusen Kaisha v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
- Dockstader v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Los Angeles Tile Jobbers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.