Legal Opinion

Caplan v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 19, 1926No. 2775PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

The appellant imported, at the port of New York, six shipments of jute webbing, which were entered in each instance as “Jute webbing, under 12 inches wide,” under paragraph 1015 of the Tariff Act of 1922. The collector classified the goods as entered. The importer protested in each instance, claiming the goods to be dutiable either at 1 cent per pound, or at 1 cent per pound and 10 per centum ad valorem, under paragraph 1008 of said act. The collector, having affirmed his original decision in each instance, the various entries and accompanying papers and exhibits were transmitted to the Board…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Arnold v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. United States v. Basket Importing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  3. United States v. Milbank, Leaman & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. United States v. Wertheimer Bros.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. Bister v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Neuman & Schwiers Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  2. Ropa Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API