Legal Opinion

Vandegrift v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 27, 1924No. 2310PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

The merchandise involved in this appeal consists of samples of woolen cloth imported in book form. The samples are used for the purpose of selling goods of which they are representative in color, texture, and design; and, when so used and the purpose to which they were dedicated has been consummated, they are thrown away.

The appeal involves entry 1304, consisting of 3,400 bunches of samples invoiced on form “not purchased by the importer,” at £630 10 0; the invoice also contained the following statement:

The above amount is the cost of the cloth in the bunches wiiich have no commercial value…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. Batten & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. Stein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Vandiver v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. F. B. Vandegrift & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. Milbank, Leaman & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Ciba Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. Proctor Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  5. Ringling Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API