Legal Opinion
In re Whirlpool Corp. Front-Loading Washer Products Liability Litigation
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 19, 2014No. Case No. 1:08-WP-65000; MDL No. 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, District Judge:
On July 12, 2010, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3), this Court certified a class of Ohio plaintiffs who own Whirlpool Duet washing machines. See docket no. 141 (“Class-Cert. Order”).1 The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed,2 and this Court recently denied Whirlpool’s Motion to Decertify the Class, see docket no. 366 (“Class Redefinition Order ”)3
*709The parties have now filed cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below: (1) Whirlpool’s Motion for Summary Judgment (docket no. 308) is GRANTED as to…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Great Northern Insurance v. BMW of North America LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
- Tatman v. VermeerOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Melnick v. Tamko Building Products, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2024
- Simpson v. Ethicon, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
- The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut v. Haldex Brake Products CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020