Legal Opinion

In re Palm

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1916No. 3,923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application by Jack Palm for writ of habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

MB. ¡JUSTICE HOLLOWAY

delivered the opinion of the court.

Jack Palm was charged by information with the commission of a felony. He demurred to the information, but before the court passed upon his objections the county attorney moved to dismiss and for leave to file a new information. The court’s [1] minutes recite the procedure had as follows: “Pending the ruling on demurrer to information, on motion of county attorney and by consent of the court, the information originally filed is ordered dismissed and a new information is ordered filed. The eourt then stated that he sustained the demurrer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. VinnMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State v. CrookUtah Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Johnson v. ReichertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Delaney v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API