Johnson v. Reichert
California Supreme Court
Application to the supreme court for a writ of mandate to compel the. state surveyor-general to receive and file an application of the petitioner for the purchase of certain state lands, and to cancel the prior- application of another person, which had been filed more than six months previous, and had remained without approval, and without the filing of a clearance certificate from the register of the United States land-office at Los Angeles, the district where the lands…
Read the full summary
Application to the supreme court for a writ of mandate to compel the. state surveyor-general to receive and file an application of the petitioner for the purchase of certain state lands, and to cancel the prior- application of another person, which had been filed more than six months previous, and had remained without approval, and without the filing of a clearance certificate from the register of the United States land-office at Los Angeles, the district where the lands were situated. The application for the writ of mandate contained the following averments as to the reason therefor: “That…
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
The application for a writ of mandate in the above-entitled cause is hereby denied, for the reason that the application should be made in the superior court.
2Cited by5 opinions
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- People ex rel. Kocourek v. City of Chicago & Schlesinger & MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Pueblo v. GonzálezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1929
- In re PalmMontana Supreme Court · 1916
- People v. GonzálezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1929