Legal Opinion

State v. Crook

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1898No. 880PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from tlie Fourth district court, Utah county. W. N. Dusenberry, Judge. Joseph E. Crook was indicted for attempting to procure an abortion. His" plea of former acquittal was overruled, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Miner, J.:

In this case the record discloses that on the 2-lst day of September, 1896, complaint in writing was filed, on the oath of Alexander Wilkins, before Charles De Moisey, justice of the peace of Provo precinct, Utah county, Utah, *214alleging that Joseph E. Crook, on the 19th day of June, 1896, at Payson precinct, Utah count3', state of Utah, unlawfully and willfully supplying, providing, and administering to one Rachel Davis, a pregnant woman, a certain drug, medicine, and substance, to wit, fluid extract of ergot, and did then and there procure said Rachel Davis to take said medicine,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex parte WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. State v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1894
  3. People v. PhippsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  4. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Beveridge v. LivingstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. TennysonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Davenport v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. State v. VaughnCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Ex Parte HayterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  5. State v. LarisUtah Supreme Court · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API