Commonwealth v. Hilfiger
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FORD ELLIOTT, Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence imposed August 27, 1991, following appellant’s conviction for a summary “hit and run” vehicular offense.1 On appeal, appellant raises two issues: 1) that the applicable statute of limitations had expired and prosecution was thus time barred, and 2) that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. For the reasons which follow, we find appellant’s arguments unconvincing and shall, therefore, affirm the judgment of sentence.
On the morning of August 28, 1990, complainant Kim A. Kane was driving her car to work on Route 15…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GriscavageSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. HarperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. QuinnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. LarsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. MarkleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KinneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. ScalesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. LongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. RankinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Com. v. Polk, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.