Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Quinn

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 1991No. 1530PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence. Roy Lee Quinn was found guilty of driving with an expired operator’s license pursuant to 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1501(a) (Purdon’s Supp.1990). Timely post-trial motions were filed and denied, and Quinn was sentenced to pay a fine and costs. This timely appeal followed.

On appeal, Quinn asserts that imposition of sentence by the trial court violated the statute of limitations contained in 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5553(e).1 Quinn argues that despite any responsibility for delay attributable to him, § 5553(e) mandates that all proceedings in the court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StoverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. JannengaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. MarkleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StadtfeldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. O'NEILL v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Commonwealth v. HilfigerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Gelnett v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver LicensingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. MarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API