Legal Opinion

Wallace Products, Inc. v. Falco Products, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 20646PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GANEY, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, a manufacturer of portable folding tables, brought this action on May 1, 1956, pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2201, 2202, seeking a judgment declaring that two patents (nos. 2,743,978 and 2,743,-979), owned by defendant Falco Products, Inc., are invalid, and that if patent numbered “978” is found to be valid, it has not been infringed by plaintiff.1 Plaintiff has also charged the defendants with unfair competition. On May 28, 1956, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint so far as it relates to patent numbered “979.” Pending…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Crosley Corporation v. Hazeltine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  3. Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Souffront v. La Compagnie Des Sucreries De Porto RicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Crosley Corp. v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Telephonics Corp. v. Lindly & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API