Baron v. Lens Crafters, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
This is an appeal from a final denial of unemployment compensation following two affirmations of qualification. Although the record may be sufficient to support the final determination of misconduct, we hold that applying a subsequent legislative amendment to reverse a double affirmation is a retroactive application that requires reversal.
FACTS
Lens Crafters employed Joseph Baron from October 1991 until December 1992 as a professional relations manager. Baron was discharged for failing to train all store managers in a process of “doctor detailing” and for falsely stating…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chapman v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Cooper v. WatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Colburn v. Pine Portage Madden Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Lovgren v. Peoples Elec. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Laue v. Production Credit Ass'n of Blooming PrairieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Icenhower v. Total Automotive, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- Meyer v. Best Western Seville Plaza HotelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Dan Delk, III, Relator v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co. (Corp.), Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Murray v. CisarCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999