Legal Opinion

Baron v. Lens Crafters, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 29, 1994No. C5-93-1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

This is an appeal from a final denial of unemployment compensation following two affirmations of qualification. Although the record may be sufficient to support the final determination of misconduct, we hold that applying a subsequent legislative amendment to reverse a double affirmation is a retroactive application that requires reversal.

FACTS

Lens Crafters employed Joseph Baron from October 1991 until December 1992 as a professional relations manager. Baron was discharged for failing to train all store managers in a process of “doctor detailing” and for falsely stating…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chapman v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Cooper v. WatsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. Colburn v. Pine Portage Madden Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Lovgren v. Peoples Elec. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Laue v. Production Credit Ass'n of Blooming PrairieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Icenhower v. Total Automotive, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  2. Meyer v. Best Western Seville Plaza HotelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Dan Delk, III, Relator v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co. (Corp.), Department of Employment and Economic DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  4. Murray v. CisarCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API