Legal Opinion

United States v. Unruh

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 3, 1987No. Nos. 84-5211 to 84-5213 and 84-5234PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

Stephen C. Forde and three of his associates in a bank fraud scheme appeal their respective convictions following a jury trial on various counts of a 72-count indictment.

Jon W. Schroeder, Edward Hart, Carol G. Unruh, William L. Fowler, and Robert Hopper were charged with Forde. The indictment charged one count of conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 371 (1982); 61 counts of misapplication of bank funds, 18 U.S.C. § 656 (1982), including a check-kiting scheme and 60 misapplied loans; three counts of false entries in bank records, 18 U.S.C. § 1005 (1982); seven counts of mail fraud,…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Marx & Co. v. Diners' Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Don Soon Park v. People of the State of (Jr) California Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Francisco Javier Alvarez, A.K.A. Frank Javier Alvarez, United States of America v. Richard ValenzuelaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. OlanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Horst Werner Joetzki, United States of America v. Lawrence Carl GisnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API