Legal Opinion
United States v. Olano
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 9, 1995No. Nos. 87-3128, 88-3096 and 88-3295PublishedCited by 147 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Dissent by Judge REINHARDT.
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
The Supreme Court having decided that the presence of alternate jurors during deliberations was not erroneous, we now decide, among myriad remaining issues, whether a juror’s stipulated absence from a half-day of trial testimony is permissible.
I
Olano and Gray participated in a complicated kickback scheme in which individuals abused their control of various financial institutions to grant unauthorized loans and extensions of credit to each other. The government brought various bank fraud charges against the two…
2Cases cited96 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by147 opinions
- Heriberto Rodriguez v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Calvin Wayne BucklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- In Re DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Personal Restraint of DavisWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Stanley Williams v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, California State Prison, San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.