Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dudoussat v. Klock

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 6, 1896No. 12,041PublishedCited by 8 opinions

^PPLIOATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Bkeaux, J.

The court in the case of the State of Louisiana vs. Numa Dudoussat entered judgment, upon the verdict, condemning him to imprisonment in the State penitentiary, at hard labor, for three years. On appeal to this court the sentence and judgment were affirmed.

Under the statute, the penalty is imprisonment at hard labor during a period of not less than one year, and not more than five years; and a fine of not less than fifty dollars, and not more than five thousand dollars.

The complaint of the relator is that the error of the trial judge, in not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Tweed v. . LiscombNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. In Re CoySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Sessions v. RomadkaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. In Re SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Sennott's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hunnicutt v. FrauhigerIndiana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Wallace v. WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
  3. In re CicaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Ex parte HolliwaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  5. Silvas v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API