United States v. Private E1 ROLLAN D. MEAD
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HAIGHT, Judge:
A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of drunken operation of a vehicle, wrongful use of amphetamine, and involuntary manslaughter by operating a motor vehicle in a culpably negligent manner, in violation of Articles 111, 112a and 119, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 911, 912a, 919 (2006) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The military judge sentenced appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for thirty-eight months, and forfeiture of all pay and allowances. Pursuant to a pretrial agreement,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. PierceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. GammonsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
- United States v. RosendahlCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. JoseyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. MeadCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013