Legal Opinion

United States v. Private E1 ROLLAN D. MEAD

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided February 25, 2013No. ARMY 20110717PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

HAIGHT, Judge:

A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of drunken operation of a vehicle, wrongful use of amphetamine, and involuntary manslaughter by operating a motor vehicle in a culpably negligent manner, in violation of Articles 111, 112a and 119, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 911, 912a, 919 (2006) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The military judge sentenced appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for thirty-eight months, and forfeiture of all pay and allowances. Pursuant to a pretrial agreement,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. PierceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  2. United States v. GammonsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  3. United States v. RosendahlCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  4. United States v. JoseyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  5. United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. MeadCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API