Legal Opinion

Michael v. Schekter

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 15, 1965No. 64-961PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TILLMAN PEARSON, Judge.

The defendant, I. Michael, appeals a summary final judgment for the plaintiff, appellee, Nathan Schekter, an in action upon a promissory note. Upon a consideration of the pleadings, and depositions on file, we hold that there are genuine issues of material fact and we reverse.

The maker of the note upon which this action is brought was I. Michael and the payee Charles Donner. Donner subsequently assigned, for valuable consideration received, the note to Nathan Schekter. The note had no due date. In two places where a due date would normally be inserted, there is no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. George E. Sebring Co. v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Horner v. Horner, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County1892
  3. Coleman v. Page's EstateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  4. Smith v. LagerstromCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Kent v. LampmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schekter v. MichaelSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
  2. Michael v. SchekterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API