George E. Sebring Co. v. Skinner
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
— This suit is one to enforce a mortgage lien. The defense sought to be interposed is that the holder of the notes evidencing the debt and the mortgage which was given to secure it is not a holder in due course for a valuable consideration and therefore the notes are held subject to the equities existing between the maker and original payee. That proposition may ' be considered as settled. See Sumter County Bank v. Hays, 68 Fla. 473, 67 So. R. 109; Prescott v. Johnson, 8 Fla. 391; Sec. 4731, Rev. Gen. Stats., 1920 (Sec. 6817, Comp. Gen. Laws, 1927) ; Livingston v. Roberts, 18 Fla. 70; 3 R. C.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stokes v. Victory Land Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Standard Manufacturing Co. v. SlotWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Glass v. CraigSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
- International Realty Associates, Inc. v. McAdooSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
- Stephens v. OrmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1862
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Barnett Bank of West Florida v. HooperSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- All Florida Surety Company v. CokerSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Pepple v. RogersSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Harris v. ZeuchSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Sutton v. CraneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.