Legal Opinion

George E. Sebring Co. v. Skinner

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 28, 1930PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

— This suit is one to enforce a mortgage lien. The defense sought to be interposed is that the holder of the notes evidencing the debt and the mortgage which was given to secure it is not a holder in due course for a valuable consideration and therefore the notes are held subject to the equities existing between the maker and original payee. That proposition may ' be considered as settled. See Sumter County Bank v. Hays, 68 Fla. 473, 67 So. R. 109; Prescott v. Johnson, 8 Fla. 391; Sec. 4731, Rev. Gen. Stats., 1920 (Sec. 6817, Comp. Gen. Laws, 1927) ; Livingston v. Roberts, 18 Fla. 70; 3 R. C.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stokes v. Victory Land Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Standard Manufacturing Co. v. SlotWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Glass v. CraigSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  4. International Realty Associates, Inc. v. McAdooSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  5. Stephens v. OrmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1862

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Barnett Bank of West Florida v. HooperSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. All Florida Surety Company v. CokerSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. Pepple v. RogersSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. Harris v. ZeuchSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. Sutton v. CraneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API