Legal Opinion

Kent v. Lampman

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 1943No. Civ. 14049PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DRAPEAU, J. pro tem.

Three individuals and a corporation, .as joint makers, made, executed and delivered to plaintiff a profaissory' note for $6,000. In preparing the note a mimeographed form was used, and the blank for a maturity date was not filled in, so that that portion of the note read: “-after date for value received.” The note also recited that collateral security was deposited for the payment thereof, with the following provision: 18That lone C. Kent has the right'tó call for such additional security as she may deem, proper^ and. on failure to respond forthwith to such call, this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Symonds v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Birsner v. BollesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Sapin v. Security First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Michael v. SchekterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Laramy v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API