Kent v. Lampman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
DRAPEAU, J. pro tem.
Three individuals and a corporation, .as joint makers, made, executed and delivered to plaintiff a profaissory' note for $6,000. In preparing the note a mimeographed form was used, and the blank for a maturity date was not filled in, so that that portion of the note read: “-after date for value received.” The note also recited that collateral security was deposited for the payment thereof, with the following provision: 18That lone C. Kent has the right'tó call for such additional security as she may deem, proper^ and. on failure to respond forthwith to such call, this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Symonds v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by4 opinions
- Birsner v. BollesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Sapin v. Security First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Michael v. SchekterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Laramy v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966