Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Page's Estate

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 4, 1943No. 15536PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Associate Justice FishburnE

delivered the unanimous Opinion of the Court:

The action in this case is founded upon the following promissory note:

“$535.96 Pamlico, S. C. Dec. 6. 1924
“-after date I promise to pay to L. B. Coleman or order Five Hundred Thirty-Five and 96/100 Dollars together with discount before and interest after maturity at the rate of 8 per cent, per annum, payable annually.
“Value received. Negotiable and payable at the Farmers & Merchants Bank, Pamlico, S. C.
“W. E. Page.”

The plaintiff herein presented to the Probate Court of Florence County a claim for the allowance of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Daughty v. Northwestern RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
  2. Bruner v. Automobile Ins. Co. of HartfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  3. Nash v. WoodwardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Burns v. LacklenMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Coastalstates Bank v. Hanover Homes of South Carolina, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2014
  3. Michael v. SchekterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  4. Carolina Constructors & Investments, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2020
  5. Eldridge v. City of GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API