Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. Rubin

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1957No. Civ. 17165PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.

Defendant appeals from judgment for plaintiff in an action tried without jury. Plaintiff appeals from the portion of the judgment denying him interest. The action arises out of a joint venture agreement by which the parties agreed to share the costs of goods purchased by plaintiff, and to share the profits of their resale. Not the least confusing feature of the case is the fact that the goods, although purchased from “Northwest Tractor and Machinery Corp.,” consisted of face creams and lotions.

The original complaint, for money had and received, was filed June 13, 1950. It named Alexander…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Lineman v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Hansen v. CovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. King v. PaulyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. United States Gypsum Co. v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nathanson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Daum Development Corp. v. Yuba Plaza, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Estate of VoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Santa Ana Medical Clinic v. First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Nathanson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API