Daum Development Corp. v. Yuba Plaza, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JANES, J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment in the principal sum of $34,924.50 entered against them in favor of plaintiff Daum Development Corporation (hereinafter, “DDC”) on its first cause of action for anticipatory breach of a written agency contract.
The individual coplaintiff (Harry Daum) did not appeal from that portion of the judgment which denied him any recovery. The matter was tried by the court upon plaintiffs’ third amended complaint, which also alleged a second cause of action in quantum meruit and a count for ordinary (nonanticipatory) breach of contract. DDC did not…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Yakov v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Pollack v. PollackTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Caminetti v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Weeks v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wesley T. Bailey v. Chattem, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Rainer v. Community Memorial HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Cecka v. Beckman & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Monroe v. Columbia Sunrise Hospital & Medical CenterNevada Supreme Court · 2007
- MacY's Department Stores, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.