Legal Opinion

Nichols v. York

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 19, 1941PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeksoN, J.

Tbe question involved: Is tbe seven-year statute of limitations, pleaded by tbe defendants in tbeir answer, available to tbem as a defense? "We tbink so.

Two contentions were made by plaintiff’s counsel in tbe trial court: (1) Tbat tbe deeds offered in evidence by defendants were not sufficient to constitute color of title; (2) tbat a wife cannot establish title to her husband’s real estate by adverse possession. Neither contention can be sustained on tbe record.

N. 0. Code, 1939 (Micbie), sec. 428, is as follows: “When a person or those under whom be claims is and has been in possession of any…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Locklear v. . SavageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Boon v. . MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Dorman v. GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Dickens v. . BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  5. Neal v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Arthur J. Fulcher, Jr. v. United States of America, Arthur J. Fulcher, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  2. Fife v. BarnardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  3. Cothran v. Akers Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Lofton v. . BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. White v. FarabeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API