Legal Opinion
Fife v. Barnard
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 2, 1951No. 4073_1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.
This was a quiet title action filed by appellants against the appellees in the Superior Court of Creek County, Oklahoma, and was removed by appropriate proceedings to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma.
We pause at the outset to say that in perfecting the appeal, appellants have violated every rule of this court with respect to shortening the record. The record consists of three volumes totaling 721 pages. One volume of 173 pages alone consists entirely of the pleadings containing numerous exhibits set out in toto, when a reference to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wright v. MattisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Elder v. McClaskeyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Sanders v. Merchants State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. Burlingame TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- State Ex Rel. Schilling v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sms Manufacturing Company, Inc., a Corporation and Manly M. Moore, Individually v. U. S.-Mengel Plywoods, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Combs v. DuBoisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- MacIas v. Guymon Industrial FoundationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, a Corporation v. Peter C. Walter, Betty Walter Allen, Jean Walter Davisson, and Daisy E. WalterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Ault v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.