Legal Opinion
Defenders of Wildlife v. Babbitt
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 12, 2001No. Civil Action 99-927(ESH)PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Defenders of Wildlife and Paul Huddy, bring this suit against defendants in their official capacities as the Secretaries and Directors of the Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, Department of Defense, United States Air Force, United States Navy, United States Army, United States Army National Guard, United States Marine Corps, Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Services, and the United States Border Patrol, alleging failure to comply with the Endangered…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Native Ecosystems Council v. DombeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Oceana, Inc. v. EvansDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Florida Key Deer v. PaulisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Carpenters Industrial Council v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Utah Environmental Congress v. RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.