Legal Opinion

Carpenters Industrial Council v. Salazar

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 1, 2010No. Civil Action 08-1409 (EGS)PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.

This case arises from a critical habitat designation and recovery plan that defendant U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (the “FWS”) promulgated with respect to the threatened northern spotted owl in 2008. Plaintiffs Carpenters Industrial Council, American Forest Resource Council, Swanson Group, Inc., Rough & Ready Lumber Co., Perpetua Forests Company, and Seneca Jones Timber Company (collectively, the “CIC plaintiffs”) contend that the FWS’s final rule on the Revised Designation of Critical Habitat for the Northern Spotted Owl, 73 Fed.Reg.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Trudeau v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  2. Skf Usa Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  3. Ethyl Corporation v. Carol M. Browner, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
  4. Defenders of Wildlife v. BabbittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
  5. Sierra Club v. Van AntwerpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Fbme Bank Ltd. v. LewDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. American Forest Resource Council v. AsheDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Douglas Timber Operators, Inc. v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. CENTER FOR NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS v. SalazarDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2011

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API