State v. Villemeyer
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.
Defendant was convicted of delivery and possession of a controlled substance, both as commercial drug offenses, after his motion to suppress evidence was denied. On appeal, he renews the argument that he made to the trial court that police officers discovered the drugs as the result of an unlawful stop. The parties agree that the interaction between police and defendant was, in fact, a stop, and they agree that the evidence was discovered because of that stop and without attenuation. The only issue on appeal is whether, when police initiated the stop, they had reasonable suspicion that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. CritesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- State v. SchedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. CodrCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. KhoshnawCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. HollinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.