Legal Opinion

State v. Hollins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 30, 2021No. A167518PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

682 Argued and submitted October 15, 2019, affirmed June 30, 2021 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CURTIS LEE HOLLINS, Defendant-Appellant. Jackson County Circuit Court 17CR75575; A167518

493 P3d 535

Following the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a consent search, defendant entered a conditional guilty plea to felon in posses- sion of a restricted weapon, ORS 166.270, reserving his right to appeal the trial court’s ruling. On appeal, defendant argues that the officer lacked reasonable suspicion to initiate the stop that led to his consent. The state responds…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. Maciel-FigueroaOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. HoldorfOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. AlvaradoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. State v. KreisOregon Supreme Court · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. LebannoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API